Part I: Definition of Terms Used
in the Task Survey for Judiciary Interpreters

The following are definitions of terms found in the survey:
Performance Domain: The major responsibilities or duties that make up the profession. Each performance domain has listed a number of content areas or tasks associated with that domain. There are three performance domains included in this survey:
Sight Translations
Consecutive Interpretations
Simultaneous Interpretations

Performance Domain Task:
A task that is part of a particular performance domain.

Evaluation Dimensions:
The three dimensions by which you will evaluate each of the performance domain task statements: Importance, Criticality, Frequency.
  • Importance: Importance is defined as the degree to which knowledge and ability of a task in the performance domain is essential to the job performance of a minimally qualified judiciary interpreter. You will be asked to rate the degree of importance of each task by using the scale below:
1
Not Important. Performance of tasks in this domain is not essential to the job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter.
2
Of little Importance. Performance of tasks in this domain is minimally essential to the job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter.
3
Important. Performance of tasks in this domain is moderately essential to the job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter.
4
Very Important. Performance of tasks in this domain is clearly essential to the job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter.
5
Extremely Important. Performance of tasks in this domain is absolutely essential to the job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter.

  • Criticality: Criticality is defined as the degree to which adverse effects could result if the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter was not able to perform a task in the performance domain.
1
No Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would have no adverse consequences.
2
Minimal Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would lead to error with minimal adverse consequences.
3
Moderate Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would lead to error with moderate adverse consequences.
4
Significant Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would lead to error with major adverse consequences.
5
Extreme Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would definitely lead to error with severe consequence.

  • Frequency: The extent to which judiciary interpreters perform tasks associated with this performance domain.
1
Never
2
Rarely ( e.g., less than once a month)
3
Infrequently (e.g., less than once a week)
4
Frequently (e.g., at least once a week)
5
Constantly (e.g., at least daily)
 
Task Survey Part II>>
Home | Project Background | Instructions | Part I | Part II | Part III | Contact Us

 

 

 

NAJIT