Part
I: Definition of Terms Used
in the Task Survey for Judiciary Interpreters
The
following are definitions of terms found in the survey:
Performance
Domain: The major responsibilities or duties that make up the profession.
Each performance domain has listed a number of content areas or tasks
associated with that domain. There are three performance domains included
in this survey:
Sight
Translations
Consecutive
Interpretations
Simultaneous Interpretations
Performance Domain Task: A task that is part of a particular performance
domain.
Evaluation Dimensions: The three dimensions by which you will evaluate
each of the performance domain task statements: Importance, Criticality,
Frequency.
-
Importance:
Importance is defined as the degree to which knowledge and ability
of a task in the performance domain is essential to the job performance
of a minimally qualified judiciary interpreter. You will be asked
to rate the degree of importance of each task by using the scale below:
1
|
 |
Not
Important. Performance of tasks in this domain is not essential
to the job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter.
|
2
|
 |
Of
little Importance. Performance of tasks in this domain is minimally
essential to the job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary
interpreter.
|
3
|
 |
Important.
Performance of tasks in this domain is moderately essential to the
job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter.
|
4
|
 |
Very
Important. Performance of tasks in this domain is clearly essential
to the job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter.
|
5
|
 |
Extremely
Important. Performance of tasks in this domain is absolutely essential
to the job performance of the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter.
|
-
Criticality:
Criticality is defined as the degree to which adverse effects could
result if the minimally qualified judiciary interpreter was not able
to perform a task in the performance domain.
1
|
 |
No
Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would have no adverse
consequences.
|
2
|
 |
Minimal
Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would lead to error
with minimal adverse consequences.
|
3
|
 |
Moderate
Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would lead to error
with moderate adverse consequences.
|
4
|
 |
Significant
Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would lead to error
with major adverse consequences.
|
5
|
 |
Extreme
Harm. Inability to perform tasks in this domain would definitely
lead to error with severe consequence.
|
-
Frequency:
The extent to which judiciary interpreters perform tasks associated
with this performance domain.
1
|
 |
Never
|
2
|
 |
Rarely
( e.g., less than once a month)
|
3
|
 |
Infrequently
(e.g., less than once a week)
|
4
|
 |
Frequently
(e.g., at least once a week)
|
5
|
 |
Constantly
(e.g., at least daily)
|
|